Chevy Chase Trust’s unique approach to Thematic Investing weaves together multiple themes across sectors, geographies, and industries, each designed to capitalize on research-driven insights. Listen to our quarterly update of economic conditions and investment strategy.
Everything we do starts with a conversation. Understanding your unique story is key in the development of a plan with your best interests in mind. To connect with us to learn more and begin a conversation, visit chevychasetrust.com.
Important Disclosures This commentary is for informational purposes only. The information set forth herein is of a general nature and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. You should not construe any information herein as legal, tax, investment, financial or other advice. Nothing contained herein constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments. This commentary includes forward-looking statements, and actual results could differ materially from the views expressed. Materials referenced that were published by outside sources are included for informational purposes only. These sources contain facts and statistics quoted that appear to be reliable, but they may be incomplete or condensed and we do not guarantee their accuracy. Fact and circumstances may be materially different between the time of publication and the present time. Clients with different investment objectives, allocation targets, tax considerations, brokers, account sizes, historical basis in the applicable securities or other considerations will typically be subject to differing investment allocation decisions, including the timing of purchases and sales of specific securities, all of which cause clients to achieve different investment returns. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), be suitable for the portfolio or individual situation of any particular client, or otherwise prove successful. Investing involves risks, including the risk of loss of principal. The level of risk in a client’s portfolio will correspond to the risks of the underlying securities or other assets, which may decrease, sometimes rapidly or unpredictably, due to real or perceived adverse economic, political, or regulatory conditions, recessions, inflation, changes in interest or currency rates, lack of liquidity in the bond markets, the spread of infectious illness or other public health issues, armed conflict, trade disputes, sanctions or other government actions, or other general market conditions or factors. Actively managed portfolios are subject to management risk, which involves the chance that security selection or focus on securities in a particular style, market sector or group of companies will cause a portfolio to incur losses or underperform relative to benchmarks or other portfolios with similar investment objectives. Foreign investing involves special risks, including the potential for greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks. Please refer to Chevy Chase Trust’s Form ADV Part 2 Brochure, a copy of which is available upon request, for a more detailed description of the risks associated with Chevy Chase Trust’s investment strategy. The recipient assumes sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information herein before making any decisions based on such information.
We penned the attached first quarter 2025 Investment Update before the Trump Administration’s April 2nd tariff announcement and the strong reactions from trading partners and financial markets.
In our Global Thematic Equity research, we try to focus beyond the noise of the short-term news cycle, as we pursue long-term investment opportunities brought about by broad secular trends that impact corporate performance and stock valuations across geographies and sectors.
Occasionally, however, the news of the moment has long-term implications for businesses and investors. We believe this is one of those times. The new tariffs upend the calculus that business leaders have used to make decisions for decades. Therefore, they require careful consideration.
These tariffs also constitute the largest peace-time tax increase in U.S. history. Yet to be determined is how much of that tax will be borne by consumers versus companies. If unchanged, the tariffs will reduce corporate profitability and raise the risk of a U.S. recession. Retaliatory tariffs likely to be enacted in response by other countries would reduce demand for U.S. exports. $8 trillion in annual sales generated by foreign subsidiaries of U.S.-domiciled multinationals are also now in jeopardy.
Understandably, these changes have roiled equity markets. The S&P 500 declined 11% in the two trading days after the announcement. The index is now down 14% year-to-date.
In addition to studying significant near-term, first-order impacts, we are focused on understanding longer-term, second- and third-order impacts that may outlast this tariff regime, particularly if the announced tariffs are merely a starting point for negotiation, as some posit. This radical pivot in trade policy is only one of several changes that are recasting the role of the U.S. on the global stage, increasing the importance of our Opportunities Abound Abroad investment theme.
While these events are deeply unsettling, we believe our time-tested investment process will help us to navigate this policy-induced volatility with a clear-eyed, long-term perspective that will ultimately benefit our clients.
During this tumultuous period, please reach out to us, or to our wealth advisors and portfolio managers, who remain intensively focused on the opportunities and risks of this moment.
Sincerely,
In the first quarter of 2025, financial markets started to reflect several of the risks we noted in our Fourth Quarter 2024 Investment Update. Already grappling with high levels of uncertainty, U.S. companies and consumers started to defer spending and investment. This is an environment for which we have prepared; we will try to navigate it with equal measures of ambition and caution.
AN ABRUPT REVERSAL
U.S. financial markets had an unsettling first quarter. After starting out strong, with the S&P 500 reaching an all-time high of 6,144 on February 19, the index dropped 10% through March 13, wiping out more than $5 trillion of U.S. equity market capitalization in just three weeks. Non-U.S. equities, however, rose nicely.
The MSCI All Country World Index excluding the U.S. (ACWI ex U.S.) finished the quarter up 4.6%, driven by double-digit increases in Germany, Hong Kong, Spain and Brazil. The S&P 500 ended at 5,612, down 4.6%, delivering its worst quarterly performance relative to the ACWI ex U.S. in over 15 years.
These results defied widespread expectations at the start of 2025 for continued strong U.S. equity market performance and weakness in the rest of the world.
We didn’t share in consensus expectations. In our Fourth Quarter 2024 Investment Update, we stated that, in our view, “U.S. equity market valuations fully reflect both recent good news and expectations of more, increasing the risk of a correction.” We listed seven risks to the S&P 500’s extraordinary run: very high expectations, valuations near record highs, U.S. equity domination, unprecedented market concentration, high bond yields, policy risk and extremely broad and high levels of equity ownership.
Clearly, trade worries weighed on investor sentiment in the latter half of the first quarter. We believe two other factors were also meaningful contributors to U.S. market declines:
A newfound measure of realism about the future profitability of artificial intelligence (AI) and continued cash flow growth for the Magnificent 71
TRADE AND TARIFFS: ONLY PART OF THE STORY
During the first quarter, the Trump Administration imposed the highest U.S. tariffs in almost a century, called them off, put them back and threatened more to come, driving the Trade Policy Uncertainty Index to a record high.
High tariffs are likely to depress trade and raise consumer prices, if left in place. Uncertainty about tariffs and other policies has already had negative effects. Many businesses are delaying capital investments and hiring until they have more clarity on policy decisions that could affect their return on investments. Wealthy U.S. households have also cut spending due to concerns about an equity market decline. As a result, many Wall Street economists lowered their forecasts for U.S. GDP growth in 2025.
Nonetheless, tariff uncertainty doesn’t seem to fully explain the drop in U.S. equities in the first quarter. Many international equity markets that appear to be vulnerable to the new tariff policy performed remarkably well. Some highly cyclical sectors, such as energy, also rose.
AI REALITY BITES THE MAG 7
The Mag 7 fell by just over 16% in the quarter and are well off their all-time highs. Since they collectively represented more than one-third of the S&P 500 when the year began, they dragged the index down, after powering it higher for the past five years.
We suspect that the Mag 7 declined in the first quarter because of growing skepticism that AI will become profitable near term. Most of the Mag 7 are quasi-monopolies. It is hard to see how investing hundreds of billions of dollars in new infrastructure will make these companies more profitable than they already are. Furthermore, history shows that major shifts to new technologies have tended to disrupt the existing market hierarchy, not reinforce it.
Concerns about Mag 7 valuations may have also taken a toll. At year-end 2024, the Mag 7 were selling at extremely high valuations: about 44 times earnings on average, including 124 times earnings for Tesla. In recent years, many analysts have justified Mag 7 valuations by citing their low capital-spending burdens. But now, the Mag 7 are spending heavily on server farms and other assets in response to the AI opportunity. As a result, the Mag 7 have higher capital expenditures relative to sales than any other sector, except utilities.
As usual, some enthusiasts claim, “this time is different.” Unlike the market favorites during the tech bubble of the late 1990s, they say, the Mag 7 companies that are investing heavily in AI are profitable and cash-flow positive. We think that story is dubious at best. We suspect that the Mag 7’s AI businesses would be revealed as deeply unprofitable if we could separate them from the cash-cow, quasi-monopoly businesses that support them. Privately held pure-play AI companies are valued at extraordinarily high multiples of minimal sales and are incurring huge losses.
FOREIGN CAPITAL FLOWS MATTER (BOTH IN AND OUT)
Repatriation of foreign funds was another driver of the market drop in the first quarter. For many years, three concurrent factors made U.S. equities very alluring to non-U.S. investors: relatively strong U.S. economic growth, strong equity market outperformance and U.S. dollar appreciation. Much of the S&P 500’s 150% rise since January 2019 was due to unprecedented buying from outside the U.S. In aggregate, non-U.S. investors increased their holdings of U.S. equities by almost $10 trillion over five years, while the value of non-U.S. holdings by U.S. equity investors “only” increased by about $2 trillion.
The situation changed in the first quarter. Some non-U.S. investors withdrew from U.S. markets, due at least in part to the sharp rise in political tensions between the U.S. and its long-time allies. For example, the Danish teachers’ pension fund, AkademikerPension, with roughly $20 billion of assets under management, said it would sell its remaining Telsa shares, mainly in response to Elon Musk’s interference in European politics. The U.K. government is pressuring pension funds to commit 10% of their assets to British equities, up from roughly 4% today. Canada is similarly exerting pressure on institutions to bring assets “home”.
If the first quarter is a harbinger of things to come, outflows could weigh heavily on U.S. equities. There are also non-political reasons to expect U.S. and non-U.S. investors to diversify equity holdings into other geographies.
THEMATIC UPDATE – OPPORTUNITIES ABOUND ABROAD
Over the last 15 years, U.S. nominal GDP grew 94%, well above the 10.5% average for the Group of 7 nations2 excluding the U.S. Over the same period, the S&P 500 rose 427%, while the MSCI ACWI ex U.S. rose only 34%. The U.S. dollar also appreciated sharply versus its trade-weighted index.
There were many reasons for U.S. economic and financial market outperformance in this period. Europe was beset by integration issues and the Sovereign Debt Crisis of 2012-2013. The U.K. vote in 2016 to leave the European Union inflicted further damage. Japan was struggling with the challenge of an aging population, sustained deflation, competition from China, and a weakening yen. Meanwhile, rapid earnings growth from the U.S. tech sector contributed to outsized profits for U.S. companies.
A more prosaic explanation for faster economic growth in the U.S. gets less attention: greater U.S. fiscal stimulus. The U.S. government has spent lavishly and cut taxes to support economic growth over the past 10 years, while other nations ran much smaller deficits relative to their economies’ sizes.
This situation isn’t likely to last. Until 2022, extremely low interest rates allowed the U.S. to accumulate increasingly higher levels of debt without interest expense spiraling out of control. However, the higher interest rates of the last few years have caused interest expense to soar. Today, interest expense is a greater share of total expenditures in the U.S. than it is in Italy, a country long associated with fiscal profligacy.
Therefore, it seems unlikely that lavish government spending and tax cuts will continue to spur the U.S. economy. By contrast, we think that U.S. tariff and defense policies are likely to prompt expansionary fiscal stimulus elsewhere.
The policy changes underway in Europe are akin to shifting tectonic plates that could set off an economic earthquake. The European Union (EU) appears to have both the will and firepower to stimulate economic growth. In a paper published early this year in the Financial Times, leaders of the European Central Bank and European Commission declared: “Europe has got the message on change. We are ready to do whatever is necessary to bring Europe back on track.” The European Commission is an independent AAA-rated bond-issuing entity, and the debt-to-GDP ratio for the EU currently sits at a relatively low level of 81%, well below the 122% for the U.S.
One area that we are confident will garner additional European investment is defense. Historically, military spending has been a strong driver of countries’ economic growth, with benefits for innovation and productivity.
In addition, European banks, which dominate European sovereign lending, are the healthiest they have been in decades. They have ample capacity to step up purchases of EU and national debt and to make consumer and business loans.
Of course, it is not all rosy across the pond. The imposition of U.S. tariffs could severely dent European exports of goods to the U.S. A tariff war with the U.S. would be unambiguously negative for the EU economy, but the damage may be somewhat offset by stimulus from increased fiscal spending.
We added our Opportunities Abound Abroad theme to portfolios almost two years ago, in the second quarter of 2023. Admittedly, we were early in this call, but we are pleased with the traction we have seen since late last year. Despite the mid-single digit increase in the first quarter of 2025, European equity indices are still significantly cheaper than the S&P 500, and we think expectations are still too low for the Continent. We are excited by opportunities in other regions, as well.
CONCLUSION
The past quarter’s returns clearly demonstrated the benefit of diversification. After several years in which a handful of mega-cap U.S. technology stocks dominated global equity market performance, positive returns came from many geographies, sectors and ideas that have been overlooked.
While the Mag 7 are down significantly from their recent highs, they are still very expensive, and their outsize share of the S&P 500 still poses a significant risk to the U.S. index. Meanwhile many non-U.S. equities are priced at such a deep discount to the U.S. that not a lot has to go right for investors to wake up to their value.
As always, we are trying to look past the short-term noise to focus on longer-term opportunities we believe are emerging for our clients.
1Amazon, Apple, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla often referred to as the “Mag 7”
2Group of 7: Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the U.K. and U.S.
Important Disclosures This commentary is for informational purposes only. The information set forth herein is of a general nature and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. You should not construe any information herein as legal, tax, investment, financial or other advice. Nothing contained herein constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments. This commentary includes forward-looking statements, and actual results could differ materially from the views expressed. Materials referenced that were published by outside sources are included for informational purposes only. These sources contain facts and statistics quoted that appear to be reliable, but they may be incomplete or condensed and we do not guarantee their accuracy. Fact and circumstances may be materially different between the time of publication and the present time. Clients with different investment objectives, allocation targets, tax considerations, brokers, account sizes, historical basis in the applicable securities or other considerations will typically be subject to differing investment allocation decisions, including the timing of purchases and sales of specific securities, all of which cause clients to achieve different investment returns. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), be suitable for the portfolio or individual situation of any particular client, or otherwise prove successful. Investing involves risks, including the risk of loss of principal. The level of risk in a client’s portfolio will correspond to the risks of the underlying securities or other assets, which may decrease, sometimes rapidly or unpredictably, due to real or perceived adverse economic, political, or regulatory conditions, recessions, inflation, changes in interest or currency rates, lack of liquidity in the bond markets, the spread of infectious illness or other public health issues, armed conflict, trade disputes, sanctions or other government actions, or other general market conditions or factors. Actively managed portfolios are subject to management risk, which involves the chance that security selection or focus on securities in a particular style, market sector or group of companies will cause a portfolio to incur losses or underperform relative to benchmarks or other portfolios with similar investment objectives. Foreign investing involves special risks, including the potential for greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks. Please refer to Chevy Chase Trust’s Form ADV Part 2 Brochure, a copy of which is available upon request, for a more detailed description of the risks associated with Chevy Chase Trust’s investment strategy. The recipient assumes sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information herein before making any decisions based on such information.
In this interview, Senior Managing Director Ramona Mockoviak shares how Chevy Chase Trust fosters a culture of collaboration and teamwork where women thrive.
How would you describe your role at CCT?
I lead Chevy Chase Trust’s Virginia office. I’m an advisor, meaning I work directly with clients and client families as a relationship manager and as the leader of the teams that deliver our services. I’m also responsible for bringing new families into our Chevy Chase Trust family. We exclusively focus on both multigenerational wealth creation and preservation. There’s a very human element to all that we do—it’s a profound professional responsibility, particularly when we’re acting in a capacity as a trustee or executor, interacting with a family in a critical time of life. I’m motivated by the desire to help.
What drew you to CCT in the first place?
I strongly believe that we add value for our clients day in and day out. I’ve had the benefit of working in large organizations, including another private bank, where I encountered many sharp elbows. You can get to the top, but there’s no benefit in trying to help others along the way. At Chevy Chase Trust, it’s the opposite—an embracing culture from Day One. Do I think our clients benefit from it? I do. We’re a steady presence that can help in every phase of their lives.
How does CCT elevate women throughout the firm?
Chevy Chase Trust has a culture of mentorship. There’s a willingness among the experienced, longstanding members of the firm, to reach out to the younger cohort in a friendly way that isn’t contrived. When mentorship is natural like it is here, and people connect with leaders they want to emulate and create a real friendship, then it’s powerful. Additionally, there aren’t barriers at the firm. The women in leadership positions, like our Chief Investment Officer, Amy Raskin, and Managing Director, Blake Doyle, are outstanding professionals, regardless of gender.
Why is female leadership important at CCT?
Until I was in the interview process to join the firm, the high number of women in key leadership positions didn’t really strike me. Now I see that it’s created a collaborative and merit-based culture. Our firm is not hierarchical. Instead, it embraces collaboration and teamwork. By elevating merit and recognizing talent, talented women are more likely to rise to the top. I also believe women are in some ways uniquely suited to be wealth managers. Women tend to be very good listeners and that translates into better strategy.
What advice would you give to other women in this field?
What I say to young women, including the young women here at Chevy Chase Trust, is to look for an environment where you can thrive and be respected. Know that you can advocate for yourself, whether it’s about your position, compensation or opportunities.
In this interview, Senior Managing Director and Co-Head of Planning Group Laly Kassa explains why female leadership is essential to better serving today’s clients.
Why is female leadership particularly important in wealth management?
Women make up half of the population, so we need representation in leadership across all industries. But it’s especially important in wealth management where, traditionally, the breadwinner and financial decision-maker has been seen as more of a man’s role — even though there’s no reason it should be. As women increasingly become breadwinners and heads of households, it’s crucial to have more women leaders in our field. Even women who haven’t been involved in finances in the past are interested and often want to learn more; they may feel more comfortable asking questions of another woman. Finally, we believe it’s important that we look like the clients we serve at Chevy Chase Trust because that is the best way to build relationships.
You mentioned women increasingly becoming breadwinners. What other shifts have you seen during your career?
Women have always played a role in financial discussions, although often it was a secondary role. Today, women are increasingly stepping into primary financial roles. Many of our clients are powerful, successful women, and when they see someone like them across the table during meetings, it is a major differentiator for us. Similarly, in families where women haven’t been the major financial contributors, having a woman as part of their financial team means they know their concerns will be heard and addressed. It’s all well and good to say we serve such clientele, but it reinforces our credibility when female clients see that the portfolio managers and planners across the table from them are women, too.
What inspired you to pursue a career in this field?
It was entirely by chance. When I was in graduate school looking for an internship, the only position available was at a private bank, so I took it without any intention of making finance my career. Surprisingly, I discovered that I enjoyed working with the markets and found the environment of a New York trading room in the 1980s very exciting. At that time, there weren’t many women in the field.
Decades later, I moved to Washington to join my husband. I connected with my former mentor from New York, who held a senior position locally. She didn’t have a specific role in mind; she simply wanted me to join her firm. The position available was “financial planner.” That prompted me to quickly learn about financial planning and led me back to grad school again — much later in life compared to my classmates — to study it formally. Once I was immersed in it, I realized I loved it, blending my passion for mathematics with meaningful human interactions. It wasn’t planned, but it turned out to be the perfect fit.
Did your mentor’s presence in the industry influence your decision to stay?
Private wealth management, in my experience, has always been at the forefront of promoting women. When I started, not many women held senior positions, but there were plenty of women around to create a supportive environment that helped us advance together. Private wealth management consistently offered more opportunities for women to move into significant roles than did corporate or investment banking. I’ve had excellent mentors of both genders, but having female mentors was particularly inspiring because they actively supported and encouraged women moving into senior leadership roles.
What changes have you seen with female leadership in wealth management?
I’ve noticed more women occupying top executive positions. While this progress isn’t uniform across the finance industry, it’s particularly noticeable in wealth management. There’s still work to do, but it has improved. Having more women in leadership roles helps to create environments that recognize and accommodate the unique challenges women may face — especially those balancing family responsibilities. Early in my career, I benefited greatly from women leaders who understood and supported my needs as a mother with young children. It’s something I remember and try to emulate today now that my own kids are grown.
Did you face any challenges as a woman, and if so, how did you overcome them?
I haven’t viewed challenges specifically through the lens of gender, but there was one instance in which a male manager promoted my male colleague over me. He explained that, although I was qualified, my colleague wouldn’t accept reporting to a woman, but I could accept reporting to him. He was right practically, but it wasn’t right fundamentally. My strategy was to take a step back, not react immediately, evaluate the situation carefully, and then gradually work my way out. Not feeling resentful and not creating a lot of noise served me better in the long run. It also helped that I had support from those less directly involved in the situation and brought a different perspective. Aside from that clear example, I’ve not encountered many overt challenges related to gender — even when working in a trading room with hundreds of men and very few women.
How does Chevy Chase Trust elevate and support women throughout the firm?
It comes through in every single aspect of our work at Chevy Chase Trust. Support for women is simply built into our organizational DNA. It’s not a question of whether we hire and promote women; it simply is our standard practice that we hire the best person for the job and those are often women. Women are at the table in this firm in the same way that men are. They hold numerous senior roles — chief investment officer, head of marketing, senior portfolio manager — and their presence is felt everywhere. This naturally fosters a supportive environment, encouraging more women to join and men that are comfortable working as equals with women in every division of the firm. We highly value camaraderie and teamwork, and this inclusive atmosphere has become a defining characteristic of our firm.
What advice would you give to women considering careers in wealth management?
The prospects in private wealth management are endless — you can start at entry-level and rise all the way to the top. But first, you need to make sure this is a profession you truly love because it’s a lot of hard work and long hours. If you genuinely enjoy the work, it won’t feel like a burden. This field offers so many challenges but also very interesting work because our clients come from many different backgrounds, with fascinating careers and complex family situations and dynamics that we help them navigate. It’s a rewarding career, and loving the work is essential if you want to thrive.
The ranking methodology for 2025’s Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State developed by SHOOK Research, is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings to evaluate each advisor qualitatively, a major component of a ranking algorithm that includes: client impact, industry experience, review of best practices and compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms.
Source: Forbes.com, awarded February 2025. Data compiled by Shook Research, LLC based on time period from 9/30/23-9/30/24. Chevy Chase Trust paid no application fee to participate.
To listen to our Q4 2024 Investment Update, follow and subscribe to Chevy Chase Trust on Apple Podcasts, Pandora or Spotify.
Chevy Chase Trust’s Quarterly Investment Update
Chevy Chase Trust’s unique approach to Thematic Investing weaves together multiple themes across sectors, geographies, and industries, each designed to capitalize on research-driven insights. Listen to our quarterly update of economic conditions and investment strategy.
Everything we do starts with a conversation. Understanding your unique story is key in the development of a plan with your best interests in mind. To connect with us to learn more and begin a conversation, visit chevychasetrust.com.
Important Disclosures This commentary is for informational purposes only. The information set forth herein is of a general nature and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. You should not construe any information herein as legal, tax, investment, financial or other advice. Nothing contained herein constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments. This commentary includes forward-looking statements, and actual results could differ materially from the views expressed. Materials referenced that were published by outside sources are included for informational purposes only. These sources contain facts and statistics quoted that appear to be reliable, but they may be incomplete or condensed and we do not guarantee their accuracy. Fact and circumstances may be materially different between the time of publication and the present time. Clients with different investment objectives, allocation targets, tax considerations, brokers, account sizes, historical basis in the applicable securities or other considerations will typically be subject to differing investment allocation decisions, including the timing of purchases and sales of specific securities, all of which cause clients to achieve different investment returns. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), be suitable for the portfolio or individual situation of any particular client, or otherwise prove successful. Investing involves risks, including the risk of loss of principal. The level of risk in a client’s portfolio will correspond to the risks of the underlying securities or other assets, which may decrease, sometimes rapidly or unpredictably, due to real or perceived adverse economic, political, or regulatory conditions, recessions, inflation, changes in interest or currency rates, lack of liquidity in the bond markets, the spread of infectious illness or other public health issues, armed conflict, trade disputes, sanctions or other government actions, or other general market conditions or factors. Actively managed portfolios are subject to management risk, which involves the chance that security selection or focus on securities in a particular style, market sector or group of companies will cause a portfolio to incur losses or underperform relative to benchmarks or other portfolios with similar investment objectives. Foreign investing involves special risks, including the potential for greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks. Please refer to Chevy Chase Trust’s Form ADV Part 2 Brochure, a copy of which is available upon request, for a more detailed description of the risks associated with Chevy Chase Trust’s investment strategy. The recipient assumes sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information herein before making any decisions based on such information.
The S&P 500 delivered another year of exceptional returns in 2024. It’s been quite a run. Today, U.S. equity market valuations fully reflect both recent good news and expectations of more, increasing the risk of a correction if inflation picks up, the economy slows or anything else goes wrong. We see the broad markets as less attractive than 12 months ago, but we’re still finding opportunities in individual companies at home and abroad that we believe will better withstand – or even benefit from – the challenges and disruption that may lie ahead.
INVESTING IN FROTHY MARKETS
It was another very strong year for global equity markets, and the U.S. again performed better than most. While the MSCI All-Country World Index generated a total return of 18% in 2024, the S&P 500 Index returned 25%.
The S&P 500 delivered similarly strong returns in 2023, and double-digit returns in five of the past six years. Its price has more than doubled from 2,507 at the start of 2019 to 5,882 at 2024’s close. In contrast, U.S. Treasuries have delivered four consecutive years of negative returns.
SOLID FUNDAMENTALS AND FROTH
There were good reasons for equity market strength in recent years. U.S. economic growth has beaten low expectations, and there still isn’t a recession in sight. In addition, inflation has fallen sharply from its highs of two years ago, prompting the Federal Reserve to lower its benchmark discount rate repeatedly, from 5.25%-5.50% in early September to 4.25%-4.50% at year end. Most analysts expect the Fed to continue cutting interest rates. There is also widespread optimism that the incoming Trump Administration will slash regulations and corporate tax rates, and that artificial intelligence (AI) will improve productivity.
But this “good news” is already reflected in share prices, and there are clear signs of froth. Consider:
The sudden surge in cryptocurrency prices
Massive retail inflows into speculative corners of the market, such as leveraged ETFs and options with zero days to expiration
Stock valuations that imply that every company related to AI will capture a significant share of a massive and highly profitable new market
Not to mention a banana duct-taped to a wall selling for $6.2 million at Sotheby’s.
SEVEN (OF MANY) RISKS TO CONSIDER
For the reasons below, we have worked over the past year to reduce risk in clients’ equity portfolios, and we think it prudent to position more defensively for 2025.
1. High Expectations: At the beginning of 2024, Wall Street economists were bearish, expecting the S&P 500 to rise by just 2% for the year, well below its long-term average annual gain. Instead, the Index rose far more than average. In contrast, the same economists now expect 2025 to be a banner year for equities, projecting above average returns despite slowing revenue growth and margins already near record highs.
2. Very High Valuations: The S&P 500 was trading at more than 26 times earnings at year end, far above its average of 19 since 2008. P/E multiples for the index have only been higher twice: in the 1990s heading into the tech and telecom bubble and for brief periods during the pandemic.
3. U.S. Equity Dominance: U.S. stocks now make up over two-thirds of the MSCI All-Country World Index’s market capitalization, an even larger share than in the Nifty-50 era of the 1970s. At $63 trillion, the total value of U.S. stocks is now four times bigger than all of Europe’s stock exchanges combined. Ten years ago, the U.S. market wasn’t even twice the European markets’ size. The Stoxx Europe 600 Index is trading at a record 40% discount to the S&P 500. In our opinion, U.S. outperformance has gone too far, even given the well-known structural deficiencies of other developed markets.
4. Unprecedented Market Concentration: The top ten companies by market capitalization in the S&P 500 now represent 39% of the Index’s total capitalization, a record high. On average, these companies are trading at about 58 times earnings, more than double the Index P/E, and more than three times their average a decade ago.
Within the top ten lies the Magnificent Seven (“Mag 7”), which drove well over half of the S&P 500’s return over the past two years. These companies may continue to do well in 2025, but we believe their best returns are behind them. Their profit-growth advantage is narrowing, and their market dominance is becoming less assured. Further, much of the excitement about the Mag 7 is tied to AI, which has thus far delivered low returns on investment.
5. High Bond Yields: Yields on 10-year Treasuries are not high relative to history, but they are well above levels typically seen since 2008. Higher bond yields theoretically raise the opportunity cost of investing in equities—particularly growth equities, whose value is expected to be generated far into the future.
6. Policy Risks: November’s U.S. election results buoyed equity markets, and small-business optimism rose markedly. While it’s true that deregulation, a cornerstone of the new administration’s platform, often leads to productivity improvements, and lower corporate taxes should boost earnings, two other pillars of its platform may be less market friendly.
First, widespread tariffs would increase the cost of goods for both consumers and businesses and may depress spending by both. More than half of global trade consists of intermediate goods that will likely be subject to higher tariffs, increasing expenses for both foreign and domestic companies. And the U.S. stock market is not an island: S&P 500 companies derive over 40% of their earnings abroad. After decades of global economic and financial market integration, the fate of many U.S. companies is intricately tied to economic prospects overseas.
Second, tight restrictions on immigration and deportation of current U.S. residents could slow the economy or increase inflation. The recent surge in immigration allowed the labor force to grow rapidly to meet demand, while wage growth normalized. As a result, U.S. policymakers, unlike most peers abroad, were able to moderate inflation without depressing economic growth. If immigration falls substantially and labor demand remains strong, the downtrend in inflation might reverse or economic growth might slow.
According to the National Foundation for American Policy, immigration has accounted for 88% of the growth in the U.S. labor force since 2019. Historically, slower labor force growth has led to slower economic growth.
7. Extremely Broad and High Levels of Equity Ownership: Strong equity market performance over the past several years has enticed U.S. investors to hold more of their wealth in equities. Today, a record-high share of U.S. families across all income levels own stocks, and equities comprise a larger share of total household financial assets than at any time since the Federal Reserve started collecting the data in 1952. That means more people would be hurt by a market drop, which could set off a broad decline in consumer spending and a negative economic feedback loop.
This list is far from all-inclusive. We could also have highlighted risks associated with record-high deficit spending and government debt, which have increased Federal interest expense from $350 billion per year in 2020 to nearly $1 trillion today; or structural issues in residential and commercial real estate; or the slowdown in U.S. job creation.
PORTFOLIO POSITIONING
Our responsibility as portfolio managers is to maximize returns while mitigating risk. In fast-rising equity markets, the responsibility of mitigating risk is often overlooked. It is hard to contend that the balance between risk and reward has not shifted at least a little after the dramatic rise in U.S. equities.
Over the past year, we have been thinking about an old quote from Bob Farrell, who was at the time chief economist at Merrill Lynch: “Exponentially rising or falling markets usually go further than you think, but they don’t correct by moving sideways.”
Farrell wrote this in late 1998, when the tech and telecom bubble was expanding to an unsustainable extreme. Farrell was right, but early. The bubble continued to expand for more than a year, before bursting in March 2000. Leaving the party too early can be very costly for investors, as can leaving the party too late.
We recognize that we, like Farrell, might be too early in taking a more cautious stance. Equity markets rise more frequently than they fall. That’s why we trimmed, rather than eliminated, many holdings that have experienced outsized returns in recent years. In general, we redeployed the proceeds from these sales into areas that have done less well and that, in our view, offer greater return potential.
Assessing the macroeconomic landscape is an important part of our four-step investment process. We use this judgment to weight our investment themes and the holdings within them. Over the past year, we reduced the portfolio weight of our Dawn of Heterogeneous Computing theme. Many of its technology stocks – including several in the Mag 7 – enjoyed outsized returns over the past two years. We believe these stocks are more vulnerable than others if the economy slows or the AI journey stumbles. After several years of underperformance, our Advent of Molecular Medicine and Next Generation Automation themes look particularly enticing to us. Significant technological advancements in the past few quarters have boosted the prospects for both themes, but this progress is not yet reflected in share prices.
We are now evaluating additions to our End of Disinflationary Tailwinds and Opportunities Abound Abroad themes. With inflation declining globally, countries outside the U.S. will likely stimulate their economies, by increasing government spending and lowering interest rates. Both actions would be likely to boost the relative performance of these two themes.
Energy, a key component of our End of Disinflationary Tailwinds theme, has been the worst-performing sector over the past two years, underperforming the S&P 500 by 54 percentage points. Investors seem to be expecting sharp declines in oil prices, despite all-time highs in global oil demand and very low inventories.
Investors may worry that the incoming President’s “Drill, Baby, Drill” rhetoric could drive up supply, depressing prices. We do not. Large U.S. energy producers have shown incredible discipline in managing their investments, balance sheets and uses of cash. They have reduced capital spending growth in recent years, and aggregate capex remains significantly below the levels of a decade ago, even in nominal terms. Many companies have told investors that they have no plans to increase production at current oil prices. Instead, they are returning cash to shareholders at record payout ratios. We view this as an opportunity.
In general, our portfolios are trading at lower valuations than their benchmark indices, while having similar-to- faster expected earnings growth. That is a setup we like and one we believe can deliver strong relative returns over time.
CONCLUSION
After more than doubling in price since the beginning of 2019, the S&P 500 was near record highs at year end. Therein lies the challenge: Defining an alternative to passive investing in a broad market that has continued to set new all-time highs and appears increasingly driven by flows and exuberance.
As active managers, we don’t invest in the market as a whole. We seek to invest in good companies with superior return potential, and avoid those with inferior potential, based on our research into broad themes that we see reshaping the economy and markets.
As 2025 begins, we are engaged in a delicate balancing act: carefully assessing risk versus reward, selling neither too early nor too late, pursuing opportunities while remaining clear eyed in the face of uncertainty. This is the mission that has energized us for decades.
Important Disclosures This commentary is for informational purposes only. The information set forth herein is of a general nature and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. You should not construe any information herein as legal, tax, investment, financial or other advice. Nothing contained herein constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments. This commentary includes forward-looking statements, and actual results could differ materially from the views expressed. Materials referenced that were published by outside sources are included for informational purposes only. These sources contain facts and statistics quoted that appear to be reliable, but they may be incomplete or condensed and we do not guarantee their accuracy. Fact and circumstances may be materially different between the time of publication and the present time. Clients with different investment objectives, allocation targets, tax considerations, brokers, account sizes, historical basis in the applicable securities or other considerations will typically be subject to differing investment allocation decisions, including the timing of purchases and sales of specific securities, all of which cause clients to achieve different investment returns. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), be suitable for the portfolio or individual situation of any particular client, or otherwise prove successful. Investing involves risks, including the risk of loss of principal. The level of risk in a client’s portfolio will correspond to the risks of the underlying securities or other assets, which may decrease, sometimes rapidly or unpredictably, due to real or perceived adverse economic, political, or regulatory conditions, recessions, inflation, changes in interest or currency rates, lack of liquidity in the bond markets, the spread of infectious illness or other public health issues, armed conflict, trade disputes, sanctions or other government actions, or other general market conditions or factors. Actively managed portfolios are subject to management risk, which involves the chance that security selection or focus on securities in a particular style, market sector or group of companies will cause a portfolio to incur losses or underperform relative to benchmarks or other portfolios with similar investment objectives. Foreign investing involves special risks, including the potential for greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks. Please refer to Chevy Chase Trust’s Form ADV Part 2 Brochure, a copy of which is available upon request, for a more detailed description of the risks associated with Chevy Chase Trust’s investment strategy. The recipient assumes sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information herein before making any decisions based on such information.
Congratulations to Deborah Gandy, Paula Landau, and Wendy Moyers for being named among Top Financial Professionals 2024 by Bethesda Magazine.
The peer survey and editorial research on which the rating was based took place from May 30 to June 18, 2024, and they were recognized on October 26, 2024. They are featured on Bethesda Magazine’s go-to list of 60 top financial experts, the gold standard for wealth management in Montgomery County and Upper Northwest D.C.
Chevy Chase Trust proudly celebrates and commends these dedicated team members for their outstanding achievements.
Neither Chevy Chase Trust nor its executives paid a fee to Bethesda Magazine in exchange for the recognition.
As of October 8, 2024, Forbes has ranked Chevy Chase Trust 10th on the 2024 Forbes/SHOOK list of America’s Top RIA Firms. After receiving more than 46,000 nominations, Forbes/SHOOK considered both qualitative and quantitative factors when conducting their research. By looking at compliance records, assets under management, revenue trends, best practices and top-notch client service, the list was narrowed down to 250 firms.
We are pleased to be on this list and stand behind our commitment to placing clients— and client success— over everything else.
Algorithm based on qualitative and quantitative data developed by SHOOK Research. Awarded October 8, 2024 for data as of March 31, 2024. Chevy Chase Trust paid no application fee to participate.
Stock indices reached new highs in the third quarter as the Fed announced its first rate cut since its battle with inflation began in 2022. While U.S. equity markets appear priced to perfection, we continue to be excited by opportunities in many of our investment themes.
A WILD RIDE ENDS WITH GAINS
After a sharp drop early in the third quarter, the S&P 500 rebounded to all-time highs by quarter end. So far this year, the Index’s total return is a strong 22.1%. The MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI) also reached new highs in the quarter and has returned a solid 19.1% year to date.
Driving the market rebound were continued signs of moderating inflation coupled with solid economic growth, which increased investor optimism that the U.S. Federal Reserve would achieve a “soft landing,” taming inflation without triggering a recession. That sentiment was bolstered in mid-September when the Fed cut its target interest rate by 50 basis points to a range of 4.75%-5.00%. This emphatic shift signaled Fed confidence that the inflation beast has indeed been slain.
AI: THIS TIME REALLY HAS BEEN DIFFERENT – SO FAR
Given that the Fed raised interest rates more and faster this time than in any cycle in the past 40 years, it is stunning that economic growth merely slowed.
Four unusual conditions allowed the U.S. economy to avoid the widely expected recession and powered strong equity market performance over the last two years.
Abundant Ultra-Low-Cost Debt: Burned by the liquidity squeeze of the Global Financial Crisis of 2008-09, consumers and corporations took advantage of a decade of near-zero interest rates to lock in long-term, fixed-rate debt at very low interest rates. As a result, many businesses and consumers didn’t need to borrow, which significantly dampened the impact of recent rate increases.
Consumers Primed to Spend: Having amassed a staggering $2.1 trillion of excess savings during the pandemic, U.S. consumers had ample resources to spend more than their incomes alone would support. This spending spree helped forestall recession.
Today, every income cohort – not just wealthy households – remains better off in inflation-adjusted terms than before the pandemic. Nonetheless, consumer spending may slow. Pandemic-era savings are largely depleted, and the savings rate is near historic lows. And, after gorging on big-ticket purchases in 2021 and 2022, U.S. consumers may have sated their appetite for new cars, home-entertainment systems and fitness equipment. Fed rate cuts may not be enough to spur a big increase in spending, as they have in the past.
A Labor Shortfall: Usually, the Fed raises rates to cool inflation after labor supply has grown to meet strong demand. But the rate hikes that began in 2022 followed two years in which the pandemic had dramatically reduced the U.S. workforce. Roughly one million people in the U.S. died, many more retired earlier than expected, and immigration effectively ground to a halt. As a result, the economy reopened with a labor shortage – the first since World War II – and wages rose as employers competed to attract scarce workers. As people slowly returned to work and immigration resumed, the labor force increased, leading to stronger-than-expected economic growth.
The Fed rate hikes of 2022 and 2023 did reduce the demand for labor, but with the total labor supply still below its pre-pandemic level, the unemployment rate remained very low. It began to inch up this past summer, however, indicating that labor supply and demand might be nearing equilibrium. From here, a further drop in demand for labor could meaningfully increase joblessness. We believe this was the main reason the Fed chose to cut interest rates in September.
Strong Corporate Profits: With high cash levels and long-term debt locked in at very low rates, U.S. company profitability and free cash flow generation remained extremely strong, despite rising interest rates. The S&P 500’s profit margins hit a record 12% in 2024’s second quarter and are now two points above their 2019 level and more than double their high during the Internet bubble in early 2000.
PRICED TO PERFECTION IN AN IMPERFECT WORLD
Monetary policy works with long and unpredictable lags. Even after the September cut, interest rates remain high, and economic growth will likely continue to slow. We believe that each of the four favorable conditions discussed above is fading. The pace and magnitude of the Fed’s monetary policy easing will be crucial to averting a recession.
We see three additional risks that investors must weigh.
A Dangerous Combination of High Expectations with Slowing Growth: The S&P 500 soared 36.3% over the past 12 months, mostly due to expanding price-earnings multiples. Actual earnings growth drove only one quarter of the index’s rise, with multiple expansion accounting for the rest. At 21.6 times forward earnings, the S&P 500 is more expensive than it has been 96% of the time since 1962. Such high valuations reflect high expectations for the economy and corporate earnings.
Current consensus expectations call for S&P 500 earnings to increase roughly 15% next year, more than double the long-term average of about 7%. It is hard to see how many companies will achieve such results, with revenue growth likely to slow and margins already near record highs.
Artificial Intelligence Yet to Prove Itself: Most of the gains in the S&P 500 this year were generated by a narrow group of tech companies, most of them related to artificial intelligence (AI). While their profitability and cash flows have been strong, there are clear signs of froth and FOMO (“fear-of-missing-out”) by both companies and investors.
Over the past 12 months, investors have poured roughly $27 billion into technology-focused exchange-traded funds (ETFs), while non-technology sector ETFs have had outflows of $6.6 billion. At the same time, capital spending by many of these companies is increasing at a significantly faster rate than sales or earnings growth. If this continues, free cash flow will decline, and investors may be disappointed.
Real-world experience does not yet support the AI mania. Hundreds of millions of people have tried ChatGPT, but most haven’t stayed with it. Almost every big company has an AI pilot project of some sort, but few are deploying AI commercially. Perhaps it is just a matter of time before AI proves out, but the short-term outlook is questionable. According to a recent article in Forbes: “77% of Employees Report AI Has Increased Workloads and Hampered Productivity.”
Commercial Real Estate in Distress: Office vacancy rates are at an all-time high and are still trending upward. Default rates are climbing in the office, apartment, retail and hotel segments. Regional banks, which account for the bulk of lending to the sector, are likely to experience more losses. Lower interest rates will certainly help, but it is unclear whether they will fall fast enough and soon enough to reverse recent trends.
PORTFOLIO STRATEGY
Given our long-term orientation, we haven’t changed our equity portfolio positioning substantially over the past quarter. The frenzy around AI continues to monopolize a disproportionate amount of investor attention. Meanwhile, our equity investment themes have quietly continued to unfold.
Next-Generation Automation: Several years ago, apparel manufacturers were the first industry to adopt ultra-high frequency RFID technology on a large scale. They used the wireless reading capability of these battery-free semiconductors the size of a grain of sand to seamlessly track inventory in their complex supply chains. Now, major logistics companies, such as UPS, are deploying the technology to track every package shipped and ensure the right parcels go in the right vehicles. Initial deployments have significantly improved efficiency and reduced misloads by more than 60%. The food and grocery industry may be next. Wireless tags, cheap enough to be placed on individual items, can allow automatic tracking of expiration dates and inventory levels, reducing spoilage and keeping shelves fully stocked. Widespread adoption in food and grocery would increase the market size many times over.
Advent of Molecular Medicine: We have long seen the clinical and commercial potential from customized healthcare treatments based on unique aspects of patients’ conditions. We are excited to see these capabilities moving into broader clinical use. Last quarter over 40% of oncologists ordered a Signatera test to help determine the optimal treatment regimen for their patients. This test was only introduced for clinical use in 2019. This rapid adoption of a molecular test reflects its ability to detect cancer recurrence months before standard imaging techniques, thereby improving patient outcomes.
Opportunities Abound Abroad: For reasons we have discussed in previous Investment Updates, we continue to believe non-U.S. equity markets trade at more attractive valuations than domestic equities. U.S. equities now account for almost two-thirds of global market capitalization, while the U.S. economy makes up only a little more than a quarter of global GDP and the U.S. has just 4% of the world’s population. Some of the geographic dispersion in P/E multiples is due to the composition of the indices, with the tech-heavy S&P 500 more expensive than the European Stoxx 600, which has greater representation in lower-valued sectors such as automobiles, energy and financials. However, even on a sector-by-sector basis, companies domiciled outside the U.S. are trading at more attractive valuations than their U.S. competitors, often despite comparable growth rates.
CONCLUSION
In the real world, things fluctuate between ‘pretty good’ and ‘not so hot,’ but in investing, perception often swings from ‘flawless’ to ‘hopeless.’ —Howard Marks, Oaktree Capital
Today, most investors are firmly in the “flawless” camp. Expectations are high for continued strong earnings growth, declining inflation and resilient labor markets. While this combination is not out of the question, it is far from assured. We continue to focus our energies on understanding the longer-term trends that we see at play in the world and the companies we expect to benefit from these, while navigating the uncertain waters of the current macroeconomy and financial markets.
Important Disclosures This commentary is for informational purposes only. The information set forth herein is of a general nature and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. You should not construe any information herein as legal, tax, investment, financial or other advice. Nothing contained herein constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments. This commentary includes forward-looking statements, and actual results could differ materially from the views expressed. Materials referenced that were published by outside sources are included for informational purposes only. These sources contain facts and statistics quoted that appear to be reliable, but they may be incomplete or condensed and we do not guarantee their accuracy. Fact and circumstances may be materially different between the time of publication and the present time. Clients with different investment objectives, allocation targets, tax considerations, brokers, account sizes, historical basis in the applicable securities or other considerations will typically be subject to differing investment allocation decisions, including the timing of purchases and sales of specific securities, all of which cause clients to achieve different investment returns. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), be suitable for the portfolio or individual situation of any particular client, or otherwise prove successful. Investing involves risks, including the risk of loss of principal. The level of risk in a client’s portfolio will correspond to the risks of the underlying securities or other assets, which may decrease, sometimes rapidly or unpredictably, due to real or perceived adverse economic, political, or regulatory conditions, recessions, inflation, changes in interest or currency rates, lack of liquidity in the bond markets, the spread of infectious illness or other public health issues, armed conflict, trade disputes, sanctions or other government actions, or other general market conditions or factors. Actively managed portfolios are subject to management risk, which involves the chance that security selection or focus on securities in a particular style, market sector or group of companies will cause a portfolio to incur losses or underperform relative to benchmarks or other portfolios with similar investment objectives. Foreign investing involves special risks, including the potential for greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks. Please refer to Chevy Chase Trust’s Form ADV Part 2 Brochure, a copy of which is available upon request, for a more detailed description of the risks associated with Chevy Chase Trust’s investment strategy. The recipient assumes sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information herein before making any decisions based on such information.
Chevy Chase Trust is proud to announce its ranking on Barron’s 2024 list of the Top 100 RIA firms. This is a testament to the hard work and dedication of our experienced and diverse team of more than 125 professionals focused on global thematic investing and planning. Based on data for the 12-month period ending on June 30, 2024 and awarded on September 16, 2024.
View Barron’s rankings here. Rankings developed by Barron’s using proprietary algorithms. Awarded September 16, 2024 for data as of June 30, 2024. Chevy Chase Trust paid no application fee to participate.
According to Barron’s, participation in the Top 100 RIA Firm Ranking is by invitation from Barron’s only. Firms submit answers to Barron’s questionnaire and Barron’s is responsible for the selecting the ranked firms. Participating firms were evaluated and ranked on a wide range of quantitative and qualitative data, including: assets overseen by the firm, revenue generated by the firm, level of technology spending, number of clients, size of staff, diversity across staff, and placement of a succession plan. The ranking is not indicative of the CCTC’s past or future performance. Neither CCTC nor its executives pay a fee to Barron’s in exchange for the ranking. Barron’s is a registered trademark of Dow Jones & Company, L.P. All rights reserved. CCTC is not affiliated with and does not endorse Barron’s and makes no representations concerning the factors used in compiling the list.
Other firms that are not included in Barron’s Top 100 RIA Firm Ranking have different assets under management/revenue than the firms included in Barron’s Top 100 RIA Ranking. If Barron’s were to use different methodologies or include all relevant firms, the results may be materially different. There may be other rankings or statistics where CCT would rank higher or lower than as described herein. The firms included in Barron’s Top 100 RIA Firm Ranking have materially different investment strategies, terms, and risk and reward profiles as compared to CCTC. As a result, prospective investors should not place undue reliance on the Barron’s Top 100 RIA Firm Ranking and the Barron’s Top 100 RIA Firm Ranking should not be used as a basis for any investment decision. The Barron’s Top 100 RIA Firm Ranking is provided for illustrative and general comparison purposes only and does not include all information applicable to an investment in any CCTC product or account. As a result, the information contained in the Barron’s Top 100 RIA Firm Ranking is incomplete. There can be no assurance that CCT will achieve comparable ranking in the future. This material does not constitute or form part of an offer to issue or sell, or of a solicitation of an offer to subscribe or buy, any securities or other financial instruments, nor does it constitute a financial promotion, investment advice or an inducement or incitement to participate in any produce, offering or investment. Any offer to purchase or buy securities or other financial instruments will only be made pursuant to definitive offering documentation, which will be furnished to qualified investors on a confidential basis at their request for their consideration in connection with any such offering. Any investment decision should be based on the information contained in such definitive offering documentation and not based on the ranking discussed herein.
Unless otherwise noted, the information contained herein has been compiled as of the date noted above, and there is no obligation to update the information. The delivery of this material will under no circumstances create any implication that the information herein has been updated or corrected as of any time subsequent to the date of publication or, as the case may be, the date as of which such information is stated.
In 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024 CCTC paid Barron’s a fee after the publication of the rankings to be listed in the Barron’s RIA Firm Directory.
Our approach seeks opportunities across asset classes and around the globe. Perhaps our single most important distinction is this: At Chevy Chase Trust, we invest in global themes. We build equity portfolios of companies positioned to exploit powerful, secular trends, disruptive ideas, innovations, and economic forces.
The smartest investment strategies are informed by sound financial planning. Our clients appreciate an integrated approach and the difference it can make. Explore the difference in our financial planning, thematic investing, risk management and fixed income strategies.
Sometimes the greatest returns come from investing in people.
We’ve created a culture that values service over products, long-term goals over short term quotas, and your success over anything else. Our team of 90 professionals is comprised of CFAs , MBAs, CFPs® and other specialists in global research, thematic investing and planning.
