WATCH VIDEO

Other News
  • Carlton Davis Interview | Carlton W. Davis, CFA | Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Posted in: News & Noteworthy, People - Why Fixed Income Investing Might Be Right for You Today In this interview, Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Carlton Davis explains […]

    Why Fixed Income Investing Might Be Right for You Today

    In this interview, Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Carlton Davis explains how adding fixed income to your investment portfolio can help you weather market volatility.

    What is fixed income investing, and what role does it play in wealth management?
    Fixed income investing seeks to deliver predictable income while preserving capital. At its core, it’s a loan — a bond — to an entity where an investor provides capital in exchange for regular interest payments. Common examples include municipal bonds, corporate bonds, U.S. Treasury securities and asset-backed securities. Fixed income investments can provide stability and income, helping to smooth out the volatility of riskier markets.

    What opportunities do you see in fixed income in the near future?
    In the current environment, I believe the fixed income market is poised to deliver attractive returns relative to the broad equity market. Yields are currently at levels not seen since the great financial crisis. I believe it’s unlikely we’ll see yields return to the ultra-low levels of the past decade, which creates an opportunity for higher returns in the future.  Starting yields are a strong predictor of fixed income total returns.

    Credit spreads, the additional yield pickup for a corporate bond versus a Treasury bond, have generally moved tighter over the past several years, but the current environment has investors revaluating the trend. Real yields (current treasury yield – expected inflation) have reached levels not seen since before the Great Financial Crisis (2008-2009), providing investors with income well above the rate of inflation. There is also a divergence in global monetary and fiscal policy that may alter asset-class valuations. These factors have led to dislocations in the bond market and provide opportunities for active managers. We are moving into a period where investors should be rewarded for identifying relative value across sectors and individual credits.

    Why is fixed income investing such an important tool in uncertain economic times?
    It comes down to peace of mind. Fixed income typically offers lower returns than equities — but also significantly lower volatility. That means predictable income when markets are choppy. Even though bond prices can fluctuate day to day, our signature buy-and-hold strategy allows us to focus on the income being generated, not the change in market value due to interest rate volatility. That’s a huge advantage in uncertain economic times — clients can rely on their bonds to mature at par and avoid selling at depressed prices as they might experience with a bond fund or ETF.

    Why does Chevy Chase Trust use individual bonds in its portfolios?
    Many individual investors buy Bond Funds or ETFs to get broad exposure to fixed income, but we see several drawbacks to this approach.

    Funds or ETFs, while a proxy for the market, do not have a predictable income stream and have no set maturity date or value.  Ownership of funds or ETFs may include additional layers of management fees, and the passive approach is exposed to impacts from fund flows and trading decisions. This defeats the purpose of most fixed income strategies.

    We believe individual bonds — not bond funds or ETFs — are the best fit for investors. With individual bonds, clients know exactly what they own, when the bonds mature and what income will be generated going forward. This clarity is incredibly useful for planning and managing expenses. Plus, individual bonds are more tax efficient, allowing you to better manage capital gains taxes. We focus on both taxable and tax-exempt bonds and tailor each portfolio to the client’s needs.

    How does Chevy Chase Trust’s approach to fixed income differ from other firms?

    Our approach combines a focus on the macroeconomic landscape with fundamental knowledge of bond issuer credit and market dynamics.  This allows us to build portfolios based on where we believe the economy and interest rates are headed. We aim to add value to portfolios, not simply take the market return.

    We are not a broker-dealer. We do not hold an inventory of bonds that we then sell to our own clients. This allows us to be nimble and focused on where we see value. We buy and sell bonds at institutional prices from a variety of sources, and our clients own bonds at the price we paid, with no markups. We’re always looking for the best ideas for our clients. When a client wants to understand why they own a specific bond, they can connect directly with the portfolio manager responsible for the decision. 

    Is fixed income investing only for older investors?
    Not at all. While many older investors own bonds because of the lower risk profile, anyone seeking stability, income or lower volatility can benefit. For example, a younger investor who is risk averse or heavily invested in riskier assets may want to offset that volatility with a more predictable, stable investment. Fixed income investing is an exercise in risk management and serves as an attractive asset-liability matching tool. The common thread among fixed income investors is the desire for predictable income and lower volatility — not age or wealth.

    What’s the biggest misperception about fixed income?
    That it’s boring. In reality, it’s one of the more complex and technical markets. Bonds don’t trade on exchanges the way equities do — we have to source and negotiate every trade. It’s about the strategy, the research and the hunt. Every day we’re digging into economic policy, company and municipality fundamentals and market technicals. It’s incredibly intricate and intellectually rewarding.

    Why were you drawn to fixed income investing?
    Fixed income forces you to be curious — to constantly learn and understand what’s under the hood. It’s a highly technical, ever-evolving market that keeps me coming back for more. One day I’m looking at new issue corporate bonds, the next day I’m conducting macroeconomic research on updated Federal Reserve policy. I have learned something new every day for the past 15 years and I will continue to learn something new every day for the next 40 years. That’s what I like the most.

  • Marc Wishkoff Interview | Marc Wishkoff | Senior Managing Director & Head of Business Development Posted in: News & Noteworthy, People -   How CCT’s Boutique Status, Personalized Approach Builds Trust with Clients In this interview, Senior Managing Director and Head of […]

     

    How CCT’s Boutique Status, Personalized Approach Builds Trust with Clients

    In this interview, Senior Managing Director and Head of Business Development Marc Wishkoff shares insights into the firm’s commitment to comprehensive wealth management solutions.

    How would you describe the Wealth Advisor/Relationship Manager role at Chevy Chase Trust?

    At Chevy Chase Trust, relationship managers play a dual role. Our team serves as both advisors and coordinators. We draw on a team of specialists with deep expertise in investments, estate and financial planning, and trust matters. Our job involves understanding clients’ needs, identifying potential issues and bringing in the right specialists to create personalized solutions. This often involves coordinating with both internal teams and external partners, such as accountants or attorneys, to keep everyone on the same page and focused on solving the client’s objectives and goals.

    What sets Chevy Chase Trust apart from other firms?

    Chevy Chase Trust is truly a unique provider in a crowded industry. We offer national firm expertise in a boutique size, with a transparent investment philosophy and the ability to speak directly to the decision-makers managing your portfolio. We are intentionally not built for scale — a distinctive model that helps us maintain a focus on our clients’ objectives over everything else. As a pioneer in thematic investing, our philosophy, process and portfolios stand out in an increasingly homogenous industry.

    Can you tell me more about your unique model?

    Because we are privately owned and operated, we have the freedom to ignore the constraints of institutionalized money management and self-serving products. This unbiased approach allows us to provide truly client-centric advice. We’re also boutique in size and nature, and we offer the same level of service for all clients, regardless of how much they invest with us. With decisions made in-house and no bureaucratic layers, we can act quickly to address client needs. Our clients and colleagues avoid dealing with distant departments and resources to solve needs or obtain solutions. Instead, my colleagues and I can walk down the hall to get answers or bring the right team member on board. This streamlined structure helps us stay focused on delivering personalized, high-quality service.

    Why do you believe your clients value this approach?
    It comes down to trust. Our team is committed to putting clients’ interests first, guided by our fiduciary principles and a dedication to transparent communication. We serve as a trusted advisor our clients can call for any financial matter, even if it’s outside our direct purview. Additionally, clients appreciate knowing their investments are in expert hands, allowing them to focus on their lives. Whether it is financial planning, investment management or personalized attention, we adapt to meet each client’s unique needs.

    What are your clients getting that they cannot find at larger institutions?
    Our boutique structure and private ownership allow us to concentrate on long-term client objectives instead of quarterly company profits. We are able to allocate resources to handle client matters so that the timing aligns with their financial goals. We also heavily invest in our business and prioritize attracting and retaining experienced talent. In fact, our investment team comprising 21 members boasts an average of 21 years of industry experience. Over the past three years, we have also grown our firm’s employee base by almost 30%1, adding several relationship managers to ensure our clients receive the high-touch service they deserve. This investment in our team ensures that every client receives personalized attention, helping our firm maintain a more than 97% client retention rate2.

    As the industry shifts toward passive investing and outsourcing, we remain active managers and differentiate ourselves by partnering directly with clients on their unique goals, leveraging our disciplined process and unwavering focus on long-term, stable growth.

    Link to Important Disclosures.

     

    1 as of 3/31/2025.
    2 More than 97% 10-year average client retention rate.
    Based on Investment Management Fees on a trailing 12-month basis.
  • Q1 25 IU First Quarter, 2025 Posted in: Featured, Investment Update, Latest News, News & Noteworthy - Click here for a printable version of the Investment Update. April 5, 2025 We penned the attached first quarter 2025 […]

    Click here for a printable version of the Investment Update.

    April 5, 2025

    We penned the attached first quarter 2025 Investment Update before the Trump Administration’s April 2nd tariff announcement and the strong reactions from trading partners and financial markets. 

    In our Global Thematic Equity research, we try to focus beyond the noise of the short-term news cycle, as we pursue long-term investment opportunities brought about by broad secular trends that impact corporate performance and stock valuations across geographies and sectors. 

    Occasionally, however, the news of the moment has long-term implications for businesses and investors. We believe this is one of those times. The new tariffs upend the calculus that business leaders have used to make decisions for decades. Therefore, they require careful consideration. 

    These tariffs also constitute the largest peace-time tax increase in U.S. history. Yet to be determined is how much of that tax will be borne by consumers versus companies. If unchanged, the tariffs will reduce corporate profitability and raise the risk of a U.S. recession. Retaliatory tariffs likely to be enacted in response by other countries would reduce demand for U.S. exports. $8 trillion in annual sales generated by foreign subsidiaries of U.S.-domiciled multinationals are also now in jeopardy. 

    Understandably, these changes have roiled equity markets. The S&P 500 declined 11% in the two trading days after the announcement. The index is now down 14% year-to-date.

    In addition to studying significant near-term, first-order impacts, we are focused on understanding longer-term, second- and third-order impacts that may outlast this tariff regime, particularly if the announced tariffs are merely a starting point for negotiation, as some posit. This radical pivot in trade policy is only one of several changes that are recasting the role of the U.S. on the global stage, increasing the importance of our Opportunities Abound Abroad investment theme. 

    While these events are deeply unsettling, we believe our time-tested investment process will help us to navigate this policy-induced volatility with a clear-eyed, long-term perspective that will ultimately benefit our clients. 

    During this tumultuous period, please reach out to us, or to our wealth advisors and portfolio managers, who remain intensively focused on the opportunities and risks of this moment.

    Sincerely,

    Signatures

    In the first quarter of 2025, financial markets started to reflect several of the risks we noted in our Fourth Quarter 2024 Investment Update. Already grappling with high levels of uncertainty, U.S. companies and consumers started to defer spending and investment. This is an environment for which we have prepared; we will try to navigate it with equal measures of ambition and caution.

     

    U.S. financial markets had an unsettling first quarter. After starting out strong, with the S&P 500 reaching an all-time high of 6,144 on February 19, the index dropped 10% through March 13, wiping out more than $5 trillion of U.S. equity market capitalization in just three weeks. Non-U.S. equities, however, rose nicely.

    The MSCI All Country World Index excluding the U.S. (ACWI ex U.S.) finished the quarter up 4.6%, driven by double-digit increases in Germany, Hong Kong, Spain and Brazil. The S&P 500 ended at 5,612, down 4.6%, delivering its worst quarterly performance relative to the ACWI ex U.S. in over 15 years.

    These results defied widespread expectations at the start of 2025 for continued strong U.S. equity market performance and weakness in the rest of the world.

    Q1 25 Exhibit 1

    We didn’t share in consensus expectations. In our Fourth Quarter 2024 Investment Update, we stated that, in our view, “U.S. equity market valuations fully reflect both recent good news and expectations of more, increasing the risk of a correction.” We listed seven risks to the S&P 500’s extraordinary run: very high expectations, valuations near record highs, U.S. equity domination, unprecedented market concentration, high bond yields, policy risk and extremely broad and high levels of equity ownership.

    Clearly, trade worries weighed on investor sentiment in the latter half of the first quarter. We believe two other factors were also meaningful contributors to U.S. market declines:

    A newfound measure of realism about the future profitability of artificial intelligence (AI) and continued cash flow growth for the Magnificent 71

    TRADE AND TARIFFS: ONLY PART OF THE STORY

    During the first quarter, the Trump Administration imposed the highest U.S. tariffs in almost a century, called them off, put them back and threatened more to come, driving the Trade Policy Uncertainty Index to a record high.

    Q1 25 Exhibit 2

    High tariffs are likely to depress trade and raise consumer prices, if left in place. Uncertainty about tariffs and other policies has already had negative effects. Many businesses are delaying capital investments and hiring until they have more clarity on policy decisions that could affect their return on investments. Wealthy U.S. households have also cut spending due to concerns about an equity market decline. As a result, many Wall Street economists lowered their forecasts for U.S. GDP growth in 2025.

    Nonetheless, tariff uncertainty doesn’t seem to fully explain the drop in U.S. equities in the first quarter. Many international equity markets that appear to be vulnerable to the new tariff policy performed remarkably well. Some highly cyclical sectors, such as energy, also rose.

     

    AI REALITY BITES THE MAG 7

    The Mag 7 fell by just over 16% in the quarter and are well off their all-time highs. Since they collectively represented more than one-third of the S&P 500 when the year began, they dragged the index down, after powering it higher for the past five years.

    Q1 25 Exhibit 3

    We suspect that the Mag 7 declined in the first quarter because of growing skepticism that AI will become profitable near term. Most of the Mag 7 are quasi-monopolies. It is hard to see how investing hundreds of billions of dollars in new infrastructure will make these companies more profitable than they already are. Furthermore, history shows that major shifts to new technologies have tended to disrupt the existing market hierarchy, not reinforce it.

    Concerns about Mag 7 valuations may have also taken a toll. At year-end 2024, the Mag 7 were selling at extremely high valuations: about 44 times earnings on average, including 124 times earnings for Tesla. In recent years, many analysts have justified Mag 7 valuations by citing their low capital-spending burdens. But now, the Mag 7 are spending heavily on server farms and other assets in response to the AI opportunity. As a result, the Mag 7 have higher capital expenditures relative to sales than any other sector, except utilities.

    Q1 25 Exhibit 4

    As usual, some enthusiasts claim, “this time is different.” Unlike the market favorites during the tech bubble of the late 1990s, they say, the Mag 7 companies that are investing heavily in AI are profitable and cash-flow positive. We think that story is dubious at best. We suspect that the Mag 7’s AI businesses would be revealed as deeply unprofitable if we could separate them from the cash-cow, quasi-monopoly businesses that support them. Privately held pure-play AI companies are valued at extraordinarily high multiples of minimal sales and are incurring huge losses.

    Q1 25 Exhibit 5

    FOREIGN CAPITAL FLOWS MATTER (BOTH IN AND OUT)

    Repatriation of foreign funds was another driver of the market drop in the first quarter. For many years, three concurrent factors made U.S. equities very alluring to non-U.S. investors: relatively strong U.S. economic growth, strong equity market outperformance and U.S. dollar appreciation. Much of the S&P 500’s 150% rise since January 2019 was due to unprecedented buying from outside the U.S. In aggregate, non-U.S. investors increased their holdings of U.S. equities by almost $10 trillion over five years, while the value of non-U.S. holdings by U.S. equity investors “only” increased by about $2 trillion.

    The situation changed in the first quarter. Some non-U.S. investors withdrew from U.S. markets, due at least in part to the sharp rise in political tensions between the U.S. and its long-time allies. For example, the Danish teachers’ pension fund, AkademikerPension, with roughly $20 billion of assets under management, said it would sell its remaining Telsa shares, mainly in response to Elon Musk’s interference in European politics. The U.K. government is pressuring pension funds to commit 10% of their assets to British equities, up from roughly 4% today. Canada is similarly exerting pressure on institutions to bring assets “home”.

    If the first quarter is a harbinger of things to come, outflows could weigh heavily on U.S. equities. There are also non-political reasons to expect U.S. and non-U.S. investors to diversify equity holdings into other geographies.

    THEMATIC UPDATE – OPPORTUNITIES ABOUND ABROAD

    Over the last 15 years, U.S. nominal GDP grew 94%, well above the 10.5% average for the Group of 7 nations2 excluding the U.S. Over the same period, the S&P 500 rose 427%, while the MSCI ACWI ex U.S. rose only 34%. The U.S. dollar also appreciated sharply versus its trade-weighted index.

    There were many reasons for U.S. economic and financial market outperformance in this period. Europe was beset by integration issues and the Sovereign Debt Crisis of 2012-2013. The U.K. vote in 2016 to leave the European Union inflicted further damage. Japan was struggling with the challenge of an aging population, sustained deflation, competition from China, and a weakening yen. Meanwhile, rapid earnings growth from the U.S. tech sector contributed to outsized profits for U.S. companies.

    A more prosaic explanation for faster economic growth in the U.S. gets less attention: greater U.S. fiscal stimulus. The U.S. government has spent lavishly and cut taxes to support economic growth over the past 10 years, while other nations ran much smaller deficits relative to their economies’ sizes.

    This situation isn’t likely to last. Until 2022, extremely low interest rates allowed the U.S. to accumulate increasingly higher levels of debt without interest expense spiraling out of control. However, the higher interest rates of the last few years have caused interest expense to soar. Today, interest expense is a greater share of total expenditures in the U.S. than it is in Italy, a country long associated with fiscal profligacy.


    Important Disclosures This commentary is for informational purposes only. The information set forth herein is of a general nature and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. You should not construe any information herein as legal, tax, investment, financial or other advice. Nothing contained herein constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments. This commentary includes forward-looking statements, and actual results could differ materially from the views expressed. Materials referenced that were published by outside sources are included for informational purposes only. These sources contain facts and statistics quoted that appear to be reliable, but they may be incomplete or condensed and we do not guarantee their accuracy. Fact and circumstances may be materially different between the time of publication and the present time. Clients with different investment objectives, allocation targets, tax considerations, brokers, account sizes, historical basis in the applicable securities or other considerations will typically be subject to differing investment allocation decisions, including the timing of purchases and sales of specific securities, all of which cause clients to achieve different investment returns. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), be suitable for the portfolio or individual situation of any particular client, or otherwise prove successful. Investing involves risks, including the risk of loss of principal. The level of risk in a client’s portfolio will correspond to the risks of the underlying securities or other assets, which may decrease, sometimes rapidly or unpredictably, due to real or perceived adverse economic, political, or regulatory conditions, recessions, inflation, changes in interest or currency rates, lack of liquidity in the bond markets, the spread of infectious illness or other public health issues, armed conflict, trade disputes, sanctions or other government actions, or other general market conditions or factors. Actively managed portfolios are subject to management risk, which involves the chance that security selection or focus on securities in a particular style, market sector or group of companies will cause a portfolio to incur losses or underperform relative to benchmarks or other portfolios with similar investment objectives. Foreign investing involves special risks, including the potential for greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks. Please refer to Chevy Chase Trust’s Form ADV Part 2 Brochure, a copy of which is available upon request, for a more detailed description of the risks associated with Chevy Chase Trust’s investment strategy. The recipient assumes sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information herein before making any decisions based on such information.

  • Ramona Mockoviak Interview | Ramona Mockoviak | Senior Managing Director Posted in: News & Noteworthy, People - Empowering Women in Wealth Management In this interview, Senior Managing Director Ramona Mockoviak shares how Chevy Chase Trust fosters a […]

    Empowering Women in Wealth Management

    In this interview, Senior Managing Director Ramona Mockoviak shares how Chevy Chase Trust fosters a culture of collaboration and teamwork where women thrive.

     

    How would you describe your role at CCT?

    I lead Chevy Chase Trust’s Virginia office. I’m an advisor, meaning I work directly with clients and client families as a relationship manager and as the leader of the teams that deliver our services. I’m also responsible for bringing new families into our Chevy Chase Trust family. We exclusively focus on both multigenerational wealth creation and preservation. There’s a very human element to all that we do—it’s a profound professional responsibility, particularly when we’re acting in a capacity as a trustee or executor, interacting with a family in a critical time of life. I’m motivated by the desire to help.

    What drew you to CCT in the first place?

    I strongly believe that we add value for our clients day in and day out. I’ve had the benefit of working in large organizations, including another private bank, where I encountered many sharp elbows. You can get to the top, but there’s no benefit in trying to help others along the way. At Chevy Chase Trust, it’s the opposite—an embracing culture from Day One. Do I think our clients benefit from it? I do. We’re a steady presence that can help in every phase of their lives.

    How does CCT elevate women throughout the firm?

    Chevy Chase Trust has a culture of mentorship. There’s a willingness among the experienced, longstanding members of the firm, to reach out to the younger cohort in a friendly way that isn’t contrived.  When mentorship is natural like it is here, and people connect with leaders they want to emulate and create a real friendship, then it’s powerful. Additionally, there aren’t barriers at the firm. The women in leadership positions, like our Chief Investment Officer, Amy Raskin, and Managing Director, Blake Doyle, are outstanding  professionals, regardless of gender.

    Why is female leadership important at CCT?

    Until I was in the interview process to join the firm, the high number of women in key leadership positions didn’t really strike me. Now I see that it’s created a collaborative and merit-based culture. Our firm is not hierarchical. Instead, it embraces collaboration and teamwork. By elevating merit and recognizing talent, talented women are more likely to rise to the top. I also believe women are in some ways uniquely suited to be wealth managers. Women tend to be very good listeners and that translates into better strategy.

    What advice would you give to other women in this field?

    What I say to young women, including the young women here at Chevy Chase Trust, is to look for an environment where you can thrive and be respected. Know that you can advocate for yourself, whether it’s about your position, compensation or opportunities.

     

    Read Ramona Mockoviaks‘ Bio »

     

    Important Disclosures

  • NVC Panelist Jeff Whitaker Chevy Chase Trust’s Pres. & CEO Jeff Whitaker Serves as Panelist at NVC Annual Economic Outlook Posted in: News & Noteworthy - On February 26, Chevy Chase Trust’s President & CEO, Jeff Whitaker attended the NVC Annual Economic Outlook gathering at George […]

    On February 26, Chevy Chase Trust’s President & CEO, Jeff Whitaker attended the NVC Annual Economic Outlook gathering at George Mason University as a panelist along with Tom Barkin of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Marc Wilson of Appian, Laura Ipsen of Ellucian and Toni Townes-Whitley of SAIC. Special thanks to NVC Chair Mark Carrier, Drew Wilder of NBC Washington for moderating the panel and President and CEO Julie Coons for hosting such a wonderful event.

  • Laly Kassa Interview | Laly Kassa | Senior Managing Director & Co-Head of Planning Group Posted in: Featured, Latest News, News & Noteworthy, People - How Women Make a Difference in Wealth Management In this interview, Senior Managing Director and Co-Head of Planning Group Laly […]

    How Women Make a Difference in Wealth Management

    In this interview, Senior Managing Director and Co-Head of Planning Group Laly Kassa explains why female leadership is essential to better serving today’s clients.

     

    Why is female leadership particularly important in wealth management?

    Women make up half of the population, so we need representation in leadership across all industries. But it’s especially important in wealth management where, traditionally, the breadwinner and financial decision-maker has been seen as more of a man’s role — even though there’s no reason it should be. As women increasingly become breadwinners and heads of households, it’s crucial to have more women leaders in our field.  Even women who haven’t been involved in finances in the past are interested and often want to learn more; they may feel more comfortable asking questions of another woman.  Finally, we believe it’s important that we look like the clients we serve at Chevy Chase Trust because that is the best way to build relationships.

     


    You mentioned women increasingly becoming breadwinners. What other shifts have you seen during your career?

    Women have always played a role in financial discussions, although often it was a secondary role. Today, women are increasingly stepping into primary financial roles. Many of our clients are powerful, successful women, and when they see someone like them across the table during meetings, it is a major differentiator for us. Similarly, in families where women haven’t been the major financial contributors, having a woman as part of their financial team means they know their concerns will be heard and addressed.  It’s all well and good to say we serve such clientele, but it reinforces our credibility when female clients see that the portfolio managers and planners across the table from them are women, too.

     

    What inspired you to pursue a career in this field?

    It was entirely by chance. When I was in graduate school looking for an internship, the only position available was at a private bank, so I took it without any intention of making finance my career. Surprisingly, I discovered that I enjoyed working with the markets and found the environment of a New York trading room in the 1980s very exciting. At that time, there weren’t many women in the field.

    Decades later, I moved to Washington to join my husband. I connected with  my former mentor from New York, who held a senior position locally. She didn’t have a specific role in mind; she simply wanted me to join her firm. The position available was “financial planner.” That prompted me to quickly learn about financial planning and led me back to grad school again — much later in life compared to my classmates — to study it formally. Once I was immersed in it, I realized I loved it, blending my passion for mathematics with meaningful human interactions. It wasn’t planned, but it turned out to be the perfect fit.

     

    Did your mentor’s presence in the industry influence your decision to stay?

    Private wealth management, in my experience, has always been at the forefront of promoting women. When I started, not many women held senior positions, but there were plenty of women around to create a supportive environment that helped us advance together. Private wealth management consistently offered more opportunities for women to move into significant roles than did corporate or investment banking. I’ve had excellent mentors of both genders, but having female mentors was particularly inspiring because they actively supported and encouraged women moving into senior leadership roles.

     

    What changes have you seen with female leadership in wealth management?

    I’ve noticed more women occupying top executive positions. While this progress isn’t uniform across the finance industry, it’s particularly noticeable in wealth management. There’s still work to do, but it has improved. Having more women in leadership roles helps to create environments that recognize and accommodate the unique challenges women may face — especially those balancing family responsibilities. Early in my career, I benefited greatly from women leaders who understood and supported my needs as a mother with young children. It’s something I remember and try to emulate today now that my own kids are grown.

     

    Did you face any challenges as a woman, and if so, how did you overcome them?

    I haven’t viewed challenges specifically through the lens of gender, but there was one instance in which a male manager promoted my male colleague over me. He explained that, although I was qualified, my colleague wouldn’t accept reporting to a woman, but I could accept reporting to him. He was right practically, but it wasn’t right fundamentally. My strategy was to take a step back, not react immediately, evaluate the situation carefully, and then gradually work my way out. Not feeling resentful and not creating a lot of noise served me better in the long run. It also helped that I had support from those less directly involved in the situation and brought a different perspective. Aside from that clear example, I’ve not encountered many overt challenges related to gender — even when working in a trading room with hundreds of men and very few women.

     

    How does Chevy Chase Trust elevate and support women throughout the firm?

    It comes through in every single aspect of our work at Chevy Chase Trust. Support for women is simply built into our organizational DNA. It’s not a question of whether we hire and promote women; it simply is our standard practice that we hire the best person for the job and those are often women. Women are at the table in this firm in the same way that men are. They hold numerous senior roles — chief investment officer, head of marketing, senior portfolio manager — and their presence is felt everywhere. This naturally fosters a supportive environment, encouraging more women to join and men that are comfortable working as equals with women in every division of the firm. We highly value camaraderie and teamwork, and this inclusive atmosphere has become a defining characteristic of our firm.

     

    What advice would you give to women considering careers in wealth management?

    The prospects in private wealth management are endless — you can start at entry-level and rise all the way to the top. But first, you need to make sure this is a profession you truly love because it’s a lot of hard work and long hours. If you genuinely enjoy the work, it won’t feel like a burden. This field offers so many challenges but also very interesting work because our clients come from many different backgrounds, with fascinating careers and complex family situations and dynamics that we help them navigate. It’s a rewarding career, and loving the work is essential if you want to thrive.

     

    Read Laly Kassas‘ Bio »

     

    Important Disclosures

  • Forbes - 2025 Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State Chevy Chase Trust Advisor on Forbes 2025 Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State List Posted in: Latest News, News & Noteworthy, People - Forbes announced the 2025 Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State and a Chevy Chase Trust advisor has made the list for the third year […]

    Forbes announced the 2025 Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State and a Chevy Chase Trust advisor has made the list for the third year in a row.

    The ranking methodology for 2025’s Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State developed by SHOOK Research, is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings to evaluate each advisor qualitatively, a major component of a ranking algorithm that includes: client impact, industry experience, review of best practices and compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms.

    Read more here: Forbes 2025 Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-in-State List

    Source: Forbes.com, awarded February 2025. Data compiled by Shook Research, LLC based on time period from 9/30/23-9/30/24. Chevy Chase Trust paid no application fee to participate.
  • Fourth Quarter, 2024 Posted in: Featured, Investment Update, Latest News, News & Noteworthy - Click here for a printable version of the Investment Update. To listen to our Q4 2024 Investment Update, follow and […]

    Click here for a printable version of the Investment Update.

    To listen to our Q4 2024 Investment Update, follow and subscribe to Chevy Chase Trust on Apple Podcasts, Pandora or Spotify.

    The S&P 500 delivered another year of exceptional returns in 2024. It’s been quite a run. Today, U.S. equity market valuations fully reflect both recent good news and expectations of more, increasing the risk of a correction if inflation picks up, the economy slows or anything else goes wrong. We see the broad markets as less attractive than 12 months ago, but we’re still finding opportunities in individual companies at home and abroad that we believe will better withstand – or even benefit from – the challenges and disruption that may lie ahead.

    INVESTING IN FROTHY MARKETS

    It was another very strong year for global equity markets, and the U.S. again performed better than most. While the MSCI All-Country World Index generated a total return of 18% in 2024, the S&P 500 Index returned 25%.

    The S&P 500 delivered similarly strong returns in 2023, and double-digit returns in five of the past six years. Its price has more than doubled from 2,507 at the start of 2019 to 5,882 at 2024’s close. In contrast, U.S. Treasuries have delivered four consecutive years of negative returns.

    SOLID FUNDAMENTALS AND FROTH

    There were good reasons for equity market strength in recent years. U.S. economic growth has beaten low expectations, and there still isn’t a recession in sight. In addition, inflation has fallen sharply from its highs of two years ago, prompting the Federal Reserve to lower its benchmark discount rate repeatedly, from 5.25%-5.50% in early September to 4.25%-4.50% at year end. Most analysts expect the Fed to continue cutting interest rates. There is also widespread optimism that the incoming Trump Administration will slash regulations and corporate tax rates, and that artificial intelligence (AI) will improve productivity.

    But this “good news” is already reflected in share prices, and there are clear signs of froth. Consider:

    • The sudden surge in cryptocurrency prices
    • Massive retail inflows into speculative corners of the market, such as leveraged ETFs and options with zero days to expiration
    • Stock valuations that imply that every company related to AI will capture a significant share of a massive and highly profitable new market
    Not to mention a banana duct-taped to a wall selling for $6.2 million at Sotheby’s.

    SEVEN (OF MANY) RISKS TO CONSIDER

    For the reasons below, we have worked over the past year to reduce risk in clients’ equity portfolios, and we think it prudent to position more defensively for 2025.

    1. High Expectations: At the beginning of 2024, Wall Street economists were bearish, expecting the S&P 500 to rise by just 2% for the year, well below its long-term average annual gain. Instead, the Index rose far more than average. In contrast, the same economists now expect 2025 to be a banner year for equities, projecting above average returns despite slowing revenue growth and margins already near record highs.

     
    Within the top ten lies the Magnificent Seven (“Mag 7”), which drove well over half of the S&P 500’s return over the past two years. These companies may continue to do well in 2025, but we believe their best returns are behind them. Their profit-growth advantage is narrowing, and their market dominance is becoming less assured. Further, much of the excitement about the Mag 7 is tied to AI, which has thus far delivered low returns on investment.


    Important Disclosures This commentary is for informational purposes only. The information set forth herein is of a general nature and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. You should not construe any information herein as legal, tax, investment, financial or other advice. Nothing contained herein constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments. This commentary includes forward-looking statements, and actual results could differ materially from the views expressed. Materials referenced that were published by outside sources are included for informational purposes only. These sources contain facts and statistics quoted that appear to be reliable, but they may be incomplete or condensed and we do not guarantee their accuracy. Fact and circumstances may be materially different between the time of publication and the present time. Clients with different investment objectives, allocation targets, tax considerations, brokers, account sizes, historical basis in the applicable securities or other considerations will typically be subject to differing investment allocation decisions, including the timing of purchases and sales of specific securities, all of which cause clients to achieve different investment returns. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), be suitable for the portfolio or individual situation of any particular client, or otherwise prove successful. Investing involves risks, including the risk of loss of principal. The level of risk in a client’s portfolio will correspond to the risks of the underlying securities or other assets, which may decrease, sometimes rapidly or unpredictably, due to real or perceived adverse economic, political, or regulatory conditions, recessions, inflation, changes in interest or currency rates, lack of liquidity in the bond markets, the spread of infectious illness or other public health issues, armed conflict, trade disputes, sanctions or other government actions, or other general market conditions or factors. Actively managed portfolios are subject to management risk, which involves the chance that security selection or focus on securities in a particular style, market sector or group of companies will cause a portfolio to incur losses or underperform relative to benchmarks or other portfolios with similar investment objectives. Foreign investing involves special risks, including the potential for greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks. Please refer to Chevy Chase Trust’s Form ADV Part 2 Brochure, a copy of which is available upon request, for a more detailed description of the risks associated with Chevy Chase Trust’s investment strategy. The recipient assumes sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information herein before making any decisions based on such information.

  • 2024 Top Financial Professionals - Bethesda Magazine Deborah Gandy, Paula Landau, and Wendy Moyers Named Top Financial Professionals 2024 by Bethesda Magazine Posted in: Latest News, News & Noteworthy, People - Congratulations to Deborah Gandy, Paula Landau, and Wendy Moyers for being named among Top Financial Professionals 2024 by Bethesda Magazine. […]

    Congratulations to Deborah Gandy, Paula Landau, and Wendy Moyers for being named among Top Financial Professionals 2024 by Bethesda Magazine.

    The peer survey and editorial research on which the rating was based took place from May 30 to June 18, 2024, and they were recognized on October 26, 2024. They are featured on Bethesda Magazine’s go-to list of 60 top financial experts, the gold standard for wealth management in Montgomery County and Upper Northwest D.C.

    Chevy Chase Trust proudly celebrates and commends these dedicated team members for their outstanding achievements.

    Neither Chevy Chase Trust nor its executives paid a fee to Bethesda Magazine in exchange for the recognition.

    Important Disclosures

  • Forbes Top RIA 2024 Chevy Chase Trust Ranks 10th on Forbes List of Top RIA Firms in 2024 Posted in: Featured, Latest News, News & Noteworthy - As of October 8, 2024, Forbes has ranked Chevy Chase Trust 10th on the 2024 Forbes/SHOOK list of America’s Top RIA Firms. After […]

    As of October 8, 2024, Forbes has ranked Chevy Chase Trust 10th on the 2024 Forbes/SHOOK list of America’s Top RIA Firms. After receiving more than 46,000 nominations, Forbes/SHOOK considered both qualitative and quantitative factors when conducting their research. By looking at compliance records, assets under management, revenue trends, best practices and top-notch client service, the list was narrowed down to 250 firms.

    We are pleased to be on this list and stand behind our commitment to placing clients— and client success— over everything else.

    See the complete Forbes list here.

    Algorithm based on qualitative and quantitative data developed by SHOOK Research. Awarded October 8, 2024 for data as of March 31, 2024. Chevy Chase Trust paid no application fee to participate.

    Methodology

    Important Disclosures

See what we’re reading View all articles